Review



wfa  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 86
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc wfa
    B. Quantification <t>of</t> <t>GFAP</t> + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus <t>WFA</t> + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
    Wfa, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__25__714174-7-64-58?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wfa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Glial cell and perineuronal net interactions in the dorsal striatum of aged mice"

    Article Title: Glial cell and perineuronal net interactions in the dorsal striatum of aged mice

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.25.714174

    B. Quantification of GFAP + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus WFA + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
    Figure Legend Snippet: B. Quantification of GFAP + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus WFA + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.

    Techniques Used: Two Tailed Test, Comparison



    Similar Products

    fluorescein vector laboratories  (Vector Laboratories)
    95
    Vector Laboratories fluorescein vector laboratories
    Fluorescein Vector Laboratories, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/pm41996240-332-35-36?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fluorescein vector laboratories - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    wfa  (TargetMol)
    90
    TargetMol wfa
    Wfa, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/10__3390_slash_ph19030495-254-25-26?v=TargetMol
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wfa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    fluorescein  (Vector Laboratories)
    95
    Vector Laboratories fluorescein
    Fluorescein, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/pm41996240-373-31-33?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fluorescein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    pbs  (Vector Laboratories)
    93
    Vector Laboratories pbs
    Pbs, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/pmc13055754-435-11-3?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pbs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    wfl  (Vector Laboratories)
    93
    Vector Laboratories wfl
    Wfl, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/pmc13055754-435-0-3?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wfl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    wfa  (Vector Laboratories)
    95
    Vector Laboratories wfa
    Wfa, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/pmc13089494-166-16-18?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wfa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    wisteria floribunda agglutinin  (Vector Laboratories)
    96
    Vector Laboratories wisteria floribunda agglutinin
    Wisteria Floribunda Agglutinin, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/pm41933682-108-27-31?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wisteria floribunda agglutinin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    wfa  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc wfa
    B. Quantification <t>of</t> <t>GFAP</t> + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus <t>WFA</t> + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
    Wfa, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__25__714174-7-64-58?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wfa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    fluorescein conjugated wisteria floribunda agglutinin  (Vector Laboratories)
    95
    Vector Laboratories fluorescein conjugated wisteria floribunda agglutinin
    B. Quantification <t>of</t> <t>GFAP</t> + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus <t>WFA</t> + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
    Fluorescein Conjugated Wisteria Floribunda Agglutinin, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/wfa/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__25__714174-7-42-47?v=Vector+Laboratories
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fluorescein conjugated wisteria floribunda agglutinin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    B. Quantification of GFAP + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus WFA + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Glial cell and perineuronal net interactions in the dorsal striatum of aged mice

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.25.714174

    Figure Lengend Snippet: B. Quantification of GFAP + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. C. Quantification of GFAP + intensity per cell. D. Quantification of GFAP + cell bodv area in the striatum. E. Quantification of average endpoints per GFAP + cell in the striatum. F. Sholl analysis of the branch profile (ramification) of GFAP + cells in the striatum. G. Percentage ofPNNs associated with a GFAP + cells. H. Quantification of WTA intensity per GFAP + cell. I. Quantification of distance of GFAP + cells to soma of PNN-ensheathed neurons. J. Linear regression analysis of GFAP intensity versus WFA + intensity per cell. R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph. Data represented as mean ± SEM, data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Sholl analysis: Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey. Regression analysis: t-test comparison of slopes, p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01. N = 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.

    Article Snippet: Coronal 30-μm hemisections containing the dorsal striatum were processed in two independent staining/imaging cohorts: ( ) microglia were labeled with Iba1 (rabbit; FUJIFILM Wako, #P3088) in combination with the lysosomal/phagocytic marker CD68 (rat; Bio-Rad, #MCA1957) and perineuronal nets (PNNs) were visualized using fluorescein-conjugated Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA; Vector Laboratories, #FL-1351); ( ) astrocytes were labeled with GFAP (rabbit; Cell Signaling Technology, #12389) together with WFA to visualize PNNs.

    Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Comparison